GISELLA SILVA
  • BLOG
  • Back to site

poverty = COMPLICATED = microcredit lending

4/27/2014

1 Comment

 
“Even today we don't pay serious attention to the issue of poverty, because the powerful remain relatively untouched by it. Most people distance themselves from the issue by saying that if the poor worked harder, they wouldn't be poor.” 
                                                                                                                                                    - Muhammad Yunus
The ability we have to live in our own tiny bubble, completely ignorant of the people who surround us, and the conditions they live in has always come as a surprise to me. Doesn't it bother you to think that we can go from seeing big buildings and beautiful homes to cardboard houses and dirt roads in just 10 minutes? We choose to ignore the reality that most Peruvians live in because as Muhammad Yunus said, we live relatively "untouched" by it. 
Picture
Picture
Picture
Poverty was one of the main reasons that lead me to choosing microcredit loans as the topic for my documentary. And although I didn't know much about micro finance when I first began, I had heard that it was one of the ways to lift people out of poverty. This made me curious to find out how effective it actually is? 

After almost a month of conducting research, and interviewing the clients and entities of micro finance, I've come to understand that microcredit lending is COMPLICATED. It's effective in the sense that it helps mitigate the negative effects of poverty, but in the long run, it's not the solution to poverty, and it doesn't make a poor country any richer. 

On the one hand, it allows people to improve their lifestyles; it gives them the means to buy a cow which will allow them to produce and sell more milk, it gives them the means to afford a safer roof for their family, and an education for their kids, but it doesn´t allow a business to grow to the extent where it generates macro growth for an economy or for the individual himself. 

Picture
One of the biggest problems with micro credit lending is that they come with very high INTEREST RATES, generally 30-40 % higher than that of a normal 
loan. This is generally because investing in people with low income is risky for the companies giving the loans, and also because the cost of administrating several small loans is much higher than that of administrating fewer larger loans. Plus, for the most part, the people that receive the loans are in such desperate access to capital that they have no other option but to accept high interest rates. 

Therefore, although microcredit lending does give people who are excluded from the financial system an access to loans, the high interest rates also holds people back from growing their business to its fullest potential. And although banks claim to have the right incentives, from what I've witnessed, I don't believe that the clients well being is always the ultimate focus of the bank, it's money. For the most part, the poor are exploited by multiple banks under the garb of helping, and clients find themselves in a debt cycle, where they keep taking out new loans to try and pay old ones. 
Picture
On one of our visits to the clients, we were told by one of the banks consultants that the banks has a certain goal for microcredit finance which they must reach in a year. This goal, however, isn't based off of how many people they help, but rather how much money they make. Plus, one of the clients we interviewed mentioned that at the moment she didn't have any loans with any bank. As soon as the consultant heard this, she tried to pursuade the client to take out another loan without even knowing if the  client really needed one. 

One of the biggest misconceptions of microcredit lending is that it approaches the poorest sector of the economy. Although this does hold some truth, because micro credit loans help the poor, it only gives credit to those who've had a business established for at least 6 months. Thus, my question is: what about the people who are making less than 2 dollars a day and can't afford to even start up a business? What system is out there to help them? Is there an entity willing to take such a risky investment and expect an even smaller return?  
Picture
If anything, I think the biggest and most important idea I've come to understand is that microcredit lending is a band aid on a much bigger problem. Yes, it creates income opportunities for one person at a time, but it doesn't make much of a change to the private sector of the economy. 
One of the best ways of lifting a countries economy is by decreasing unemployment. Micro credit lending, however, doesn't invest in companies that do so because for the most part, the people working in the business's are the owners themselves or family members. The growth their business's experience is so small that they don't need any more help than they already have. If we want a countries economy to really grow, we need to make investments in small-to-medium sized enterprises, those that are "bigger than a fruit stand, but smaller than a Fortune 100 corporation."

It would be needless to say that microcredit loans have no impact on the poor, because they do; they E M P O W E R entrepreneurship, they I M P R O V E a struggling families lifestyle, and they open doors to new O P P O R T U N I T I E S. But it is very few people who go from owning a fruit stand to owning a large grocery store, and although the current structure of microcredit lending is incapable of eradicating poverty by itself, it's definitely a start, and a system that can and should be improved.  
Picture
1 Comment

A journey through microcredit lending 

4/24/2014

0 Comments

 
Picture
If you were to ask a complete stranger what they find easier to produce--a movie or a documentary--I'm pretty sure they would go with the documentary. At least that's what I thought, until I went through the process of making one. 

After about three weeks of working on our documentary, Andrea and I have made quite some progress; we've finished our outline, are in the process of finishing our script, and filming of our footage. Nonetheless, we still have a long way to go! 

One of the biggest CHALLENGES I've faced has been keeping up with all of the necessary planning. By this, I mean planning not only what we are going to do when, but where we are planning to film, how we plan on getting  
there, who we are going to interview, when were planning to contact them, what questions we're planning to ask them, etc. Although failure can't be anticipated--and shouldn't-- because one learns from it, by planning carefully you can avoid making unnecessary mistakes. 

A second challenge we've experienced has been gathering valuable footage. For the most part, when you don't know the person you're interviewing, it's hard to tell them to speak louder or to move to the left; it's hard to have them genuinely share their story with you because 1) they don't know you 2) they have a camera in front of them. Thus, despite having an image in my mind of what I picture our documentary to look like, after every interview I find myself modifying that picture accordingly. 
Picture
Picture
In a movie, you can hand the actors a script to memorize and write a detailed storyboard to go with it. In a documentary, however, you have no set "script", and both your story and the concept of your documentary can change drastically based on the interviews you've done and the information you've received. 

For instance, last Wednesday we went to interview some of our clients. I was expecting these interviews to turn out great, but they turned out to be the complete opposite. The client would barely talk, and he would speak at such a low tone that it was impossible to understand him. That same Wednesday we went to interview the SBS, Superintendencia de Banca, Seguros, y AFP. When we got there, they told us that we wouldn’t be able to film--just record--and that we couldn’t take our laptops with us. Plus, the guy we interviewed was so knowledgeable about micro credit lending that he spoke with terms that were hard for Andrea and I to understand, and that would 
definitely be hard for our audience to understand.

When you're in situations like these, it's not as simple as calling to set up another appointment with a different person, or asking your interviewee to speak louder after already having asked him twice. Or maybe it is, but it definitely requires some personality to do so, and to be completely honest, one of the things Andrea and I fear is that we are asking for “too much” from our interviewee’s. 

On the other hand, one of our SUCCESSES has been finding several people—and the right people—to interview.  So far we’ve had interviews with the CEO of Mibanco, the SBS, Banco Financiero, a professor from UBC and from the Universidad de Piura, and eight clients! We are still hoping to interview a Caja Municipal. By doing so, we would be getting the perspective of all the entities involved in giving micro credit loans.

Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
A second SUCCESS we’ve had, but something we’ve really struggled with at the same time was remaining unbiased. I began this project with the mindset that micro credit lending was very effective, therefore, in the first interviews we conducted I only looked out for the “positive” remarks made by the interviewee and subconsciously blocked out the negative. This came across in our script because we were trying to do every possible thing to create a story where micro credit lending appeared to be “perfect”. But it’s not, and that is equally as important to mention as the advantages it poses. Why? Because it makes your documentary credible and allows your audience to form their own conclusions regarding the effectiveness of micro credit loans in Peru. 

At this point, I feel that everything is pretty much coming together, but there were definitely times when I felt they were falling apart. One of these was on Wednesday, when we took the morning off to film one of the parts of our video.
Francisca, my maid, talked about her experience receiving a micro credit loan. But she had never really received a loan before, so we had asked her to pretend like she had, and in a way made her invent her own story. This sounds really wrong, and now that I think about it, it was, especially because a documentary is all about maintaining a realistic point of view, but like I said, Andrea and I were glued to portraying this perfect world of microcredit lending, and we felt that the only way of doing this was by including this “invented” story. When we told Mr. Topf about what we had filmed, he made us realize that inventing this story means that we would most likely lose credibility; he was completely right. This also meant, however, that we had put 3 hours of filming time to waste and that we had to re-do our script. I was definitely frustrated, but together with Andrea we decided to sit down and “re- think” our project. This gave us a “fresh” look on our documentary and it made us realize the importance of remaining UNBIASED. 
Picture
Picture
As I mentioned at the beginning, although we still have a long way to go, our documentary is finally coming together. We’ve filmed a lot of the necessary footage, and we have a strong script to use as a base for the remaining filming and editing of our film. Now, it’s a matter of gathering all of our research and footage to create a story from the multiple stories we’ve heard. It’s like 
putting together the pieces of a puzzle. Some pieces will be hard to place, but with all the border pieces--in this case the script--we have the base to fill in the rest of the puzzle.  

Through each interview that we conduct I get more of my questions answered, but I also form new ones. Some of the things I’m still wondering are: 
Are the banks only incentive to give microcredit loans money? Is the economic growth brought forth by microcredit lending sustainable? What can be done to make microcredit loans available to the poorest people in Peru’s population, not just those who can afford to start a business for 6 months? 
Picture
0 Comments

Be the teacher of your own learning 

4/14/2014

1 Comment

 
Every since I was in first grade I've grown up to believe that learning means sitting in front of a desk and listening to a teacher lecture a class. However, when I became part of the Innovation Academy, I came to understand that there really is no such thing as a "teacher", and if there is, then we're all teachers of our own learning. 
Picture
A teacher's job shouldn't be to spill out content, it should be to to create an environment that allows us to take in content. Think about a time in which you didn't understand a math problem and there was no one around to help you. I guarantee that once you finally understood the problem, the concept stuck to you for much longer than when your teacher explained it in class. Why? Because the best way to learn something is by struggling through it. 

Producing my documentary is the perfect example of something Andrea and I have struggled through because we've been given so much independence with it. Thus, there comes moments where we don't know what to do next, or where we're not sure how in depth our work needs to be because there is no one telling us exactly what to do. And although this can be very frustrating at times, I find that this frustration has made me thirsty for knowledge and its allowed me to improve my work in such a way that I would have never done so if I had a rubric to follow. 

Picture
A few days ago, Alex and Michelle, founders of Planet of the Kids, traveled down from San Francisco to give us a workshop on design thinking. Up until high school, both siblings attended a private school in Sillicon Valley that enforces project based learning and innovation. 

What I most loved about their workshop was that they replaced the role of a "teacher" that most of us were used to. Throughout the presentation I completely forgot that they were younger than us and that we had just met them, because despite our age difference, I felt I had so much to learn from them. This proves that you don't need a "teacher" to learn, and just like we are all the teachers of our own learning, we can also be the FACILITATORS of other peoples learning regardless of our AGE, RACE, or CULTURE. 

That same day a group of students from Team Academy came to visit us. Team Academy is a University in the Netherlands that believes highly in experiential learning and entrepreneurship. The students in this university travel to different parts of the world in search of market opportunities. They basically learn about business while starting their own; talk about a hands on learning entrepreneurial adventure!

When they first arrived to our class, I honestly thought that they were 25, they were really, really tall. But just like the visit from Alex and Michelle, despite them being older (and much taller than us), we were able to carry out an hour long conversation without much intervention from our "teachers". We learned from them and their program in the same way that they learned from us, and we were able to help them by giving them contacts for their businesses.  

These experiences have taught me that learning doesn't necessarily come from a "teacher", and as I mentioned previously, there really is no such thing as a "teacher". There are however, facilitators of learning. If you think about it, anyone can teach, some people can do it better than others, but just because a "teacher" knows how to teach doesn't mean that the student is actually learning. Transferring knowledge from the mind of a "teacher" to that of  students is a lot harder than it seems. Why? Because knowledge is CONSTRUCTED, not TAUGHT. Knowledge is the gathering of content, experience, and skills, and there is only so much of that which a "teacher" can teach us. 

Therefore, we should take advantage of the experiences that allow us to learn from others, and we should make the effort to experience what we are learning, not simply read about it or hear someone talk about it. We should meet more people like Alex, Michelle, and the Team Academy. We should share what we know with others, and in the process, we can facilitate other peoples learning. 

Last time I checked, if we set our minds to learning something we can learn it. We are the teachers of our own learning, remember? 
1 Comment

My JAB family :)

4/13/2014

0 Comments

 
Picture
Picture
About two months ago, I received an email saying that I had been accepted to attend the 2014 Junior Advisory Board in Spain, a conference held by IE University where 15 selected high school juniors from around the globe embark on an all-expenses-paid trip to discuss the biggest problems facing higher education, and to find a way in which a "university of the future" could realistically confront and resolve these challenges. 

Picture
As I sat on the plane on Friday and looked back at my JAB experience, I realized that what I learned went far beyond the conference's initial focus. 

Over the past week I was given the privilege to meet and work with 14 people from around the world, from places like Lebanon, Switzerland, Japan, the Kingdom of Swaziland, India, Jordan, Columbia, Greece, etc. 

To be completely honest, the first day I was really scared because I felt that I was surrounded by fourteen miniature Einstein's, and I felt out of place. But as the days went by, I came to realize that more than being smart, these 14 people had a passion for learning, and that is something I felt I could relate to. 

Throughout the conference, I felt that I was genuinely being listened to. It wasn't one of those conversations were although everyone is "hearing", only a small group of people are actually listening. You would think that we had to be very careful about what we said because we were all from such different parts of the world, but surprisingly, none of us were afraid to share what we had to say because while we were all so 
DIFFERENT, we were also all very 
ACCEPTING. 

Picture
Picture
Picture
On the last night, we stayed up late and played truth or dare. When I say truth or dare, however, I don't mean the typical "How many girls have you kissed" version of the game. We asked each other questions like "Do you think you deserve to be where you are in life", and "If you had three wishes to do anything in the world what would they be?". 

My friend Rahul from India explained how despite feeling deserving of this opportunity, and overcoming a lot in life to get here, he feels guilty for being at this all expense-paid trip because there are thousands of people in India who can't even afford to pay for a decent meal or an education. I completely understand where he is coming from; we see so much poverty in our every day lives, and yet we go out and buy things that we don't even need. I'm no exception. And although one part of me feels deserving of this opportunity, it also makes me think how many people I could have helped with the money that was invested in me to come here. 

My friend Aia, from Lebanon, explained how she would only ask for one wish, and that would be to make the world a  F A I R E R  place. Not more equal, but more fair. One clear example of this is in school. There are so many people around the world that buy their way through high school and college despite having all the means to succeed on their own. They cheat on exams, pay prestigious universities in order to get admitted , and have professional write their college research papers. 

Is that fair? 

Fair not only to the students that are working their
 buts off, but fair to the people who D R E A M of receiving an E D U C A T I O N? 
In my opinion, it's not, and it's something that frustrates me, especially because I see it happen a lot. But something Rahul told me--and he's completely right-- is that at the end of the day, the people that buy their way through life aren't successful because they're not truly learning. I rather look back at my life and know that I've earned where I stand, not live with the guilt and consciousness of knowing I paid my way through it. 
Picture
One of the stories that most impacted me was that of my friend Alwaleed, from Saudi Arabia. He was the first person I met, the last person I said goodbye to, and probably one of the people I have most respect for. He has the biggest passion for physics--his dream is to study theoretical physics at Cambridge University--and he is currently living in London by himself so that he can complete the IB Diploma. 

His parents live in Saudi Arabia, therefore, he is basically a 17 year old living an adult life. He told me how he doesn't need a teacher to learn, because to him, education is so valuable that even it it means that he must read a huge textbook by himself, he'll do it. He's watched four movies in his entire life--he loves watching documentaries--and when asked whether he's ever drunk alcohol he said "absolutely not". 

He's different, and I LOVE that. 
Picture
Picture
One of the things I really didn't understand was how everyone was aware of the problems facing education but they are still all planning to attend universities that embody many of these problems. My friend Kerem--from Turkey--said he didn't believe that attending an Ivy League was the best option for many of us because it was clear that we weren't looking for a traditional education. We were looking for real world experiences, hands on learning, relevancy, and personalization. 

Nonetheless, the problem that many mentioned was that attending an Ivy League is like giving yourself a brand, it secures you a good future. And although I understand their point of view completely, I also believe that it isn't your college degree that will get you far in life, it is who you are how hard you work. Yes, the college you attend can play a role in your future, but it is most certainly not the only determining factor of success. Plus, if we all attend these universities just because they ensure us "safety", wll education ever change? I think we need people like Rahul, Aia, and Karem, to drive the change in education, and to make universities realize that there is more than one way of learning, and the university we attend should mirror the way we learn best. 

Something that came up in our conversation was how we all have this guilt when we are not working. But what does working really mean? Is it sitting in front of a textbook and taking notes? Is it writing essays? Schools have engraved this idea in our minds that when we're not "working", as in sitting in front of a pen and paper, or on our computers, we're not learning. But doesn't the best learning come from experience? We didn't learn how to talk or walk by sitting in front of a piece of paper, we learned by actually doing it. Thus, we shouldn't feel guilty for doing the things we love, because for the most part, we are probably learning more by doing them than by reading off a text book. 

I could probably go on for hours about each of the 14 people I met, the conversations I had with them, and the experiences we shared, because they are one of the most different and genuine group of people I've gotten the chance to work with. This experience proved to me that the country we come from, the color of our skin and the languages we speak are just tiny barriers we must overcome to understand how similar we really are to one another. I really hope that some day, and some time in the future, I get to meet up with each and everyone of these people again, because I would love to see the remarkable things that they are going to do with their lives.  
If anything, my JAB family 
I N S P I R E D me.
Picture
0 Comments

The question is MOOC? 

4/7/2014

0 Comments

 
What would the world be like if education were accessible to everyone? Would crime rates diminish? Would unemployment decrease? Would we witness economic growth? Economic development? 

One of the topics that I most loved from our discussions at JAB was that which focused on MOOCs, Massive Online Open Courses, which are online courses delivered electronically to massive audiences from all around the world. Together with 14 other students, I was given the opportunity to participate in IE Universities radio show--where we debated the Pro's and Con's of MOOC's. 
Picture
Picture
Picture
PRO's

CHOICE 
There are no limitations as to when or where you can take MOOC's, what courses you choose to take, how many classes you enroll in, or how many different universities you take a course from. Thus, MOOC's offer students autonomy, choice, and flexibility. If you're an early bird, the course is to your availability in the morning, if you work throughout the day, you can take the course at night!  
Picture
NETWORKING
Picture
MOOC's bring together people from all around the world with a common interest, it makes education which was previously unavailable to students now accessible to people from around the world. By doing so, it unites students through interactive online user forums, gives them global perspectives, nurtures connections, and opens several doors for the future. 
OPENS THE 
DEMOGRAPHICS
Picture
Currently, MOOCS are free or nearly free, thus, it makes quality education available and affordable to everyone. Since no application is required to enroll in the courses, anyone--from any country and with any SAT/ACT score--can take the course. 

CON's

LOSS OF AN ENRICHING EXPERIENCE
Picture
I think it is fair to say that one of the best things about school is the fact that you are surrounded by so many different people and knowledgeable professionals. You get to discuss in small groups, ask questions to your professor, and undertake in hands on learning. Unfortunately, MOOC's do not provide these services in the same way. Facilitating meaningful conversations in classrooms with over 150,000 students is hard, and participating in online forums does not provide the same level of intimacy as face to face communication, thus, the experience is not as enriching to students. Without human interaction, it's very hard to receive the true college experience. 

EDUCATION FOCUSING ON CONTENT
Picture
One of the biggest and latest shifts in education is going from teaching pure content to teaching a combination of skills and content. Why? Most business's today don't simply care about what you know, they care about what you can do with what you know. Thus, one of the biggest disadvantages of MOOC's is that they focus purely on teaching content. Yes, through these courses you may learn how to think critically and gather information, but do you really practice skills such as collaboration, leadership, and communication? 
HIGH DROP OUT RATES 
Due to the lack of human interaction, MOOC's have a 90 percent dropout rate. 
At the end of the day, do the advantages of having MOOC's outnumber the disadvantages? I believe they do simply because it makes EDUCATION accessibly to ANYONE. Therefore, whether you are rich or poor, young or old, as long as you have a drive for learning--and an internet cafe nearby--you have the right to an education. 

Some would argue that it is unfair that some people pay 60,000 dollars to receive a Harvard education while others can simply get it for free online. I disagree. The people receiving that education are paying for it because they can afford to pay for it. Plus, as previously mentioned, MOOC's may offer a student with quality content, but it most certainly does not come close to offering the full college experience. The way I see it, the objective of MOOCS is not to replace traditional education, it is simply to make education accessible to all. And what's better?
EDUCATION for some or EDUCATION for
ALL?
0 Comments

Investing in yourself

4/2/2014

3 Comments

 
When we think of investing our money, the first place that comes to most of our minds is the stock market. But if Charles Wheelan has taught me anything it is that 
The  SINGLE  most important
 investment we can make is in  OURSELVES.
By investing in ourselves I mean investing in human capital. Investing in education, in health, in safety, in ways to acquire scarce skills. Because at the end of the  day, the more scarce your skills and talents, the better compensated you are. Nonetheless,  human capital doesn't simply embody that which you buy, it embodies virtues such as  perseverance, honesty, and creativity. 

About a year ago, I watched an experiment on Youtube where a scientist placed flees in an opened jar. As one can expect, the flees immediately jumped out. But when the scientist placed a glass lid over the top of the jar, the flees couldn't fly out without hitting themselves and falling at every attempt of jumping. After a while, the fleas had been condition to the height of the jar, and despite removing the lid, the flees never jumped any higher than the jar again. 
Picture
To a certain extent, the fleas can act as a representation of us humans. Often times, when we face an obstacle--such as the glass lid--we train ourselves to stay beneath it, beneath our point of failure. Why? Because we're tired of hitting our heads, and to be quite honest, we're afraid of being ridiculed. However, if we want a scarce human capital, we must stop thinking about failing and start thinking of ways to push through our failure. At the end of the day, we can't think outside the box if we're afraid of what we'll find outside.

Similar to the fleas, there's a theory known as the crabs-in-a-bucket theory. It explains how a crab can easily escape out of a bucket when it's by itself. But when the crab is placed with multiple crabs, and it tries to escape, all of the other crabs pull it down. The analogy for humans is that, out of envy and conspiracy, we try to pull each other into the bucket because we fear that by having someone climb out, we are risking they achieve success beyond our own.  

I was able to relate this theory to a concept Charles Wheelan mentioned: relative utility.  
An experiment was conducted where you could choose between two "worlds." World A, where  you would earn 110,000 dollars, while everyone else earned 200,000, and World B, where you would earn 100,000 dollars while everyone else earned 80,000. 

Despite being richer in option A, and thus being able to afford more, the experiment showed that most people would be happier in world B because they would be wealthier in relation to everyone else. 

Picture
It's amazing to me how, by nature, many of us find pleasure in being better off than those who surround us. And although a difference in wealth can be positive at times because it motivates us to work harder and be more productive, what happens when the difference in wealth is so large that it becomes dismotivating instead of empowering? 

As Mr. Wheelan mentioned, if the pie is growing, how much should we care about the size of the pieces? Is it fair that the rich get richer, while the poor get poorer? As a matter of fact, why is there such a large gap between the rich and the poor in the first place? 

Through Naked Economics, I've learned that part of the cause for such a gap is that the rich have the resources to invest in their human capital, and our economy is growing in favor of skilled workers. For instance, many firms have moved towards the idea of using technology to make production more efficient. Although this benefits high skilled individuals who are tech savvy, as they will be the ones designing such technology, this could result as a job loss for low skilled workers. As a result, the poor get poorer, and the rich get richer. 

One thing that continues to baffle me is the  C O M P L E X I T Y  of such a situation. What about the people who can't afford to improve their human capital? How are they suppose to develop "scarce" skills without any resources? How do we not know that the next Steve Jobs is not one of the thousands of people who can't afford an education?

In fact, I originally thought microcredit loans were given to allow people living in very low socio economic condition to start a small business. It turns out, however, that a micro credit loan is only given to someone thats had a small business running for at least 6 months. While I understand this is a rule the bank must have to avoid giving out loans that are too risky, I ask myself, what about the people who can't even afford to start up a small business? What are they suppose to do? Who's there to help them? Is it fair that their slice of the pie gets smaller and smaller? 
3 Comments

    Archives

    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    June 2013
    September 2011

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed


Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.